Survey: University students uncomfortable with ‘campus carry’
More students were uncomfortable about having concealed weapons on college campuses than were comfortable with the idea, according to a new survey led by a Sam Houston State University professor. The results mesh with public statements against ‘campus carry’ by university leaders, teachers and students, including a letter signed by two Texas A&M faculty that has sparked an ethics investigation.
The Texas Legislature has several campus-carry bills for its consideration, the foremost being Senate Bill 354 by state Sen. Jeff Wentworth (R-San Antonio) and House Bill 750 by state Rep. Joe Driver (R-Garland).
According to survey results posted on the SHSU website, The average SHSU student had a 39 percent comfort level (out of 100 points) with the idea of concealed weapons on campus, and an average comfort level of 49 percent about concealed weapons in the community.
“It also appears from a comparison of opinions related to guns on campus versus opinions about concealed handguns in the wider community that these students perceived the university as a unique setting, in that they were notably less comfortable with the idea of allowing concealed handguns in that setting than in the community at large,” according to the study.
SHSU criminal justice professor Jeffrey Bouffard led the survey of 1,317 SHSU students and 375 students at a Washington university, where the average student reported a 33 percent comfort level of concealed weapons on campus.
“To date, little effort has been made to assess students’ opinions about whether concealed handgun carrying should be allowed on college and university campuses,” according to the study. “While the current study examines only two universities (albeit in different parts of the country), the results are strikingly similar in that college student opinion seems to be against a policy change that would allow the carrying of concealed weapons on campus.”
The study will be presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences Meeting in Toronto this month.
In Texas, 23 percent of students were “not comfortable at all” and 10 percent were “very comfortable” with ‘campus carry.’ In Washington, 27 percent were “not comfortable at all” and 8 percent were “very comfortable” with ‘campus carry.’
While support and opposition to campus-carry legislation tends to cut across party lines, two A&M faculty are being investigated for a letter posted on the A&M website stating their personal opposition to guns on campus, the Bryan-College Station Eagle reports. According to Eagle reporter Vimal Patel, “[a] university rule states Texas A&M can’t endorse support or promote “partisan political activity.”"
The letter authors — Dean of Faculties Antonio Cepeda-Benito and Bob Strawser, speaker of the Faculty Senate — defended themselves to the Eagle, saying the letter was meant to inform not to “lobby;” they weren’t opposing a specific piece of legislation; campus carry is a work-related issue to faculty, not a political one; and the purpose of the letter was to encourage discussion among faculty.
As the Eagle reported, a different but similar letter by Cepeda-Benito alone is still posted on the Dean of Faculties (.pdf) website.
In the letter (.pdf), Cepeda-Benito says: “I am wholeheartedly against allowing guns in classrooms. To sum it up, I have little doubt that concealed weapons may make those carrying them feel safer. However, I am also certain that those of us who now feel safe without guns will no longer feel safe if these laws are passed.” (author’s emphases)
The controversy over the faculty members’ letter comes on the heels of a symbolic vote by A&M students, with 57 percent opposing among more than 13,600 votes cast, the Eagle’s Patel reported previously.
In late February, University of Texas System Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa sent a letter to Gov. Rick Perry stating his strong opposition to campus carry. According to the Texas Tribune’s Reeve Hamilton, “His concerns, it turns out, are numerous, ranging from unease on the part of campus mental health professionals to questions about heightened risks in laboratories and hospitals where pressurized gases are present.”
After an informational forum on campus carry was held at UT-Arlington, the university’s President James Spaniolo and Student Congress each made a public statement against guns on campuses, Spaniola via a letter and the Student Congress via a resolution, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported
The Council of Student Services Vice Presidents — representing 46 university campuses in Texas — also endorsed an anti-campus carry letter sent to lawmakers. According to the letter signed by Council Chair H. Eliot Chaneaux: “Those in our organization who are military veterans remind us that soldiers are not allowed to bring weapons into their barracks. The armed forces have determined that allowing even trained soldiers to introduce weapons into closed quarter housing is not advisable, yet we are considering allowing that very thing to occur on our college campuses.”
Lets do a POLL !!!
I’d feel safer at a college that:
1) Forced “everyone” to store guns in cars, allowing easier access to guns on campus for criminals committing vehicular burglaries. (The most common crime on campuses across Texas, and increasing in frequency)
2) Allowed licensed, responsible, adults who underwent training and background checks on Local, State, and National levels, to have their weapons safely secured and concealed while they are in buildings like they are everywhere else.
——————
Personally, I HAVE had my car broken into and the contents stolen.
I have NEVER had anyone reach into my pants in class or in the library to see what might be concealed in there.
Considering the increased risk of a gun ending up in a criminal’s hands on campus with car storage as it is now, I’d vote for the second option.
Why provide easier access to guns for criminals on campus?
It makes no sense.
My 40 caliber Glock stolen from the truck it was stored in hasn’t been found yet. It will probably turn up someday, somewhere, maybe they’ll find it after a convenience store robbery or something and get it back
to me I hope.
That was 20 years ago in Houston parking lot when I was on Staff at University of Houston.
Maybe it’s in Mexico now, but I’d rather keep control of my guns and keep them safe and secured.
Making Staff and Faculty store guns in cars for criminals on campus to get while leaving them defenseless if an unlicensed student decides to bring an AK-47 to school to shoot the teacher (actual occurrences) doesn’t make sense.
The bill needs to pass so they are stored safely and securely as they are at Wal-Mart, Church, Grocery stores, Restaurants, at the Bank, and everywhere else that “people” go.
It’s just common sense.
PROHIBITED ACTS OF AGENCIES AND INDIVIDUALS
Sec. 556.006. LEGISLATIVE LOBBYING.
(a) A state agency may not use appropriated money to attempt to influence the passage or defeat of a legislative measure.
(b) This section does not prohibit a state officer or employee from using state resources to provide public information or to provide information responsive to a request.
Additionally, Spaniolo’s message appears to also be a violation of the UTA Employee Ethics & Standards of Conduct which states that, “Employees are not allowed to support or oppose legislation (orally or in writing) as representatives of UT Arlington.”
The university, a “state agency”, pays Spaniolo, Lamas, and Cigarroa salaries with “appropriated money”. So by them taking an official position opposing the legislative measure and writing to influence the defeat of it, aren’t they in violation of Texas Government Code? Not only does that put their jobs at risk, it also jeopardizes state funding for the university.
Also, besides just salaries …. misusing/appropriating Taxpayer/State Funded Resources such as …
Using the University’s website …. email spam he sent etc,
Computers, Servers, Bandwidth, etc etc etc.
March 03, 2011
Letterhead and postage+envelope to mail to Rick Perry, plus the University’s resources and time spent, how about secretarial time we pay for? Or did he type it himself? On “Company time”?
On Feb. 24, UT System Chancellor Francisco Cigarroa sent a letter, expressing his opposition to concealed carry on campus, to Gov. Rick Perry using taxpayer funded resources.
President James Spaniolo joined the discourse on Thursday, March 3, sending an e-mail to the UTA community voicing strong disapproval of concealed carry using taxpayer funded resources.
President James Spaniolo on Thursday, March 3 Posted opinions on legislation on the University’s website, using taxpayer funded resources
Perhaps someone who wants honesty and transparency in governance might send info to the Powers ruling over the “Powers that be” perhaps even to the legislative people or …… Attorney General to investigate.
People who violate laws, and policies, are the biggest opponents of concealed carry and safe secure storage by responsible law abiding citizens …
I’d like to see something on the TV news about the investigation into this by the Attorney General..
Ok, The Someothername guy is correct about the Texas Government Code violations, however, he needs to stop with the copy/pasting from other’s comments and create his/her own.
“Additionally, Spaniolo’s message appears to also be a violation of the UTA Employee Ethics & Standards of Conduct which states that, “Employees are not allowed to support or oppose legislation (orally or in writing) as representatives of UT Arlington.”
The university, a “state agency”, pays Spaniolo, Lamas, and Cigarroa salaries with “appropriated money”. So by them taking an official position opposing the legislative measure and writing to influence the defeat of it, aren’t they in violation of Texas Government Code? Not only does that put their jobs at risk, it also jeopardizes state funding for the university.”
This statement I posted in another article I commented on. At least put it into different words before reposting it.
Why are the OTHER polls and resolutions ignored in this article?
TEXAS A&M Galveston Student Senate Endorses Concealed Carry.
This Senate Resolution was passed during Texas A&M University at Galveston’s Student Government Association’s Senate meeting on Sunday, November 19, 2010.
—-
Texas State University
The group voted 24-10 on Monday to pass a resolution backing a proposed bill that would allow anyone to carry a concealed handgun around campus if they are 21 or older, have a concealed carry license, and have undergone training and background checks.
—
Obviously, polls asking “should guns be allowed on campus”” is prejudicial. I mean if I vote “no” the police won’t leave them at home, neither will criminals.
The polls were biased from the beginning.
Some people are smart enough to see the bias, not that the following wording mentions nothing about Faculty or Staff or adult visiting Parents etc.
but you don’t hear these “polls” being announced:
Should students be allowed to carry guns on campus or keep them in their campus dorms?
* Yes (92%)
* No (8%)
This poll was from the University of Houston attached to a biased article “Republicans want to arm students”
I would be more comfortable hearing what SWAT officers would like to see when they get to campus during a shooter situtation. If they like the idea of everyone carrying, I’m okay with it too. If not, drop it.
[...] recent years, opinion polls at the UT-San Antonio and Sam Houston State University, and a referendum vote at Texas A&M University all showed a [...]
[...] recent years, opinion polls at the UT-San Antonio and Sam Houston State University, and a referendum vote at Texas AM University all showed a clear [...]
[...] recent years, opinion polls at the UT-San Antonio and Sam Houston State University, and a referendum vote at Texas A&M University all showed a [...]