Author Archive

Va. bill would remove abortion funding for women with totally incapacitated fetuses

Posted on: January 16th, 2013 by Reilly Moore No Comments

A proposal in the Virginia General Assembly to eliminate state funding for certain abortions could force some low-income women to carry to term a fetus with a low likelihood of survival. (more…)

Long Election Day lines strengthen push for early voting in Va.

Posted on: December 14th, 2012 by Reilly Moore No Comments

A Virginia early voting bill failed during the past six General Assembly sessions, but some lawmakers hope that frustration over long lines during the 2012 election will lead to a more productive discussion on how to make voting more convenient. (more…)

Va. health commissioner resigns over abortion clinic rules

Posted on: October 18th, 2012 by Reilly Moore 6 Comments

Virginia’s health commissioner resigned Thursday, citing recent legal interpretations regarding abortion clinic regulations that she said prevented her from doing her job. (more…)

Ultrasound law interferes with health services, clinic says

Posted on: August 17th, 2012 by Reilly Moore 215 Comments

RICHMOND — A state law requiring women to receive an ultrasound at least a day before having an abortion has already caused a Northern Virginia health clinic to reduce its non-abortion services in the month since it took effect, according to a clinic official. (more…)

Legal experts dispute Cuccinelli’s ‘tortured’ reading of abortion law

Posted on: July 5th, 2012 by Reilly Moore 4 Comments

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, via the Virginia Office of the Attorney General.

RICHMOND, VA. – The Virginia Board of Health ignored legal advice from the state attorney general’s office earlier this month when it exempted existing abortion clinics from tough new regulations pushed by pro-life advocates. But at least some experts and civil liberties activists are now saying that attorney general’s office was wrong and that the board acted within its authority. (more…)

Thorne-Begland appointed to Va. judgeship

Posted on: June 14th, 2012 by Reilly Moore 4 Comments

Tracy Thorne-Begland on ABC's "Nightline," May 19, 1992.

RICHMOND – The Richmond, Va., Circuit Court appointed openly gay prosecutor Tracy Thorne-Begland to an interim judgeship Thursday, a month after the state’s House of Delegates voted to reject his candidacy. (more…)

Virginia voter ID law comes with a price

Posted on: June 14th, 2012 by Reilly Moore 2 Comments

RICHMOND — Legislators and budget officials said Virginia’s new voter ID law would have little to no fiscal impact, but it turns out that preparing for its implementation will cost the state about $2 million this year.


Family Foundation’s claims disputed in Thorne-Begland controversy

Posted on: May 23rd, 2012 by Reilly Moore 3 Comments

Tracy Thorne-Begland on ABC's "Nightline," May 19, 1992.

RICHMOND–A Virginia lawmaker is challenging claims by social conservatives that the legislature’s judicial subcommittee did not have the opportunity to properly vet potential judges before they initially approved an openly gay nominee.

Prosecutor Tracy Thorne-Begland’s judicial nomination was thought to be uncontroversial through most of the process. He sailed through the bipartisan subcommittee’s questioning more than a month ago with no lawmakers raising concerns about his sexual orientation or activism.

But the nomination was derailed in the state’s House of Delegates last week after the Family Foundation of Virginia launched a last-minute campaign to keep him off the bench.

The Family Foundation raised concerns about Thorne-Begland’s advocacy for LGBT rights. The group pointed in particular to the fact that he was discharged from the Navy following his decision to come out as gay in 1992 in protest of the military’s ban on gay and lesbian service members.

Information on Thorne-Begland’s military history was widely available prior to the subcommittee interview. He wrote an op-ed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch in 2010 explaining his decision to come out and discussed it in multiple other interviews over the past two decades.

But legislators and the Family Foundation expressed no concerns about his candidacy until just days before the full House of Delegates voted on his appointment, and as a result, Thorne-Begland and his supporters had little opportunity to respond to the criticism.

In an interview last week with The American Independent, Family Foundation official Chris Freund claimed that subcommittee process had been insufficient and that lawmakers didn’t have an opportunity to “vet him thoroughly.”

“They don’t have a lot of time,” Freund said of lawmakers on the judicial subcommittee. “They can ask questions but it’s just simply based on a resume that’s put in front of them and some paperwork and they kind of take the word of the legislators who have brought the individuals before the committee.”

But Democratic Del. Jennifer McClellan, who serves on the House Courts of Justice committee, disputes Freund’s assertions. McClellan tells TAI that lawmakers had time to prepare for the judicial interviews and could ask as many questions as they wanted.

“The judicial interviews are not under a time limit,” McClellan says. “I sat through interviews in which sitting judges and judicial candidates are grilled for sometimes up to an hour over concerns raised by the press, individuals, or lawmakers.”

McClellan said the case of Norfolk Circuit Judge Norman Thomas showed that lawmakers had the ability to go far beyond reviewing “resumes” and could have thoroughly investigated candidates they had concerns about.

Thomas pleaded no contest to a charge of violating a protective order in 2005. At his reappointment interview in December 2011, lawmakers asked Thomas to explain in detail his involvement in the incident and ultimately decided not to reappoint him, McClellan said.

McClellan said Thorne-Begland received one question during his subcommittee interview about a courtroom dispute he was involved in, but no questions about his discharge from the military, his decision to come out on television, or his gay rights advocacy.

“Delegate Cline asked him what kind of plane he flew when he was in the Navy,” McClellan said. “Given the way the Republican caucus talks, if anyone had concerns they would have asked more questions.”