search
Sections List
The American Independent

Courts deliver victory to opponents of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina

A federal court has ordered that North Carolina’s heavily gerrymandered state districts be redrawn and that the state must hold new primaries for state-level representatives in September 2017 followed by a general election in November 2017. The case, Covington vs. the State of North Carolina, argued that race-based districting — like that in North Carolina, where […]

By Erin Reed - December 07, 2016
Share
Supreme Court

A federal court has ordered that North Carolina’s heavily gerrymandered state districts be redrawn and that the state must hold new primaries for state-level representatives in September 2017 followed by a general election in November 2017.

The case, Covington vs. the State of North Carolina, argued that race-based districting — like that in North Carolina, where the oddly-drawn lines swept up areas with large Black populations from multiple cities to keep them in the same district and thus dilute their voting power — sends a message to representatives that “their primary obligation is to represent only the members of [a single racial] group.”

The map below illustrates what is being argued in Covington. Notably, there are numerous districts which have “tendrils” and do not seem to follow natural political boundaries. For instance, predominantly Black areas in the cities of Goldsboro and Warsaw are combined into a single district, while the majority white companion town of Elroy, which is closer to Goldsboro than Warsaw is, has its own district.

Because Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates in much higher numbers, this racialized districting allowed a Republican to run uncontested in the last election.

[media-credit name=”Anthony Reed using Census 2010 data and bdistricting.com maps” align=”alignnone” width=”625″]pic1[/media-credit]

It seems apparent that the map was drawn to diminish the voting power of Black residents in the area, and the Fourth Circuit Court agrees, issuing this statement:

While special elections have costs, those costs pale in comparison to the injury caused by allowing citizens to continue to be represented by legislators elected pursuant to a racial gerrymander.

Republicans in North Carolina have stated they plan to challenge the ruling, which state Senator Bob Rucho and Representative David Lewis, the Republican chairmen of the Senate and House redistricting committees, called a “politically motivated” abuse of judicial authority.

The United States Supreme Court is also separately hearing the case of McCrory vs Harris, regarding North Carolina’s congressional districts, from which elected officials are sent to the U.S. House of Representatives. A lower court in the case ruled that these congressional districts “constituted illegal racial gerrymanders in violation of the Voting Rights Act” and that “state lawmakers had placed disproportionately large numbers of black voters in these two districts, thereby diluting the impact of their votes.”

The map below illustrates the issues raised in this case, the clearest example of racial gerrymandering being the division of the Black and white areas of Durham. The red district, NC CD-1, concentrates Black voters in a single district. One tendril reaches into the majority Black area of Durham; the district then stretches all the way to the largely Black areas of Goldsboro. These locations are 70 miles away from each other — no city between them is in the same district.

[media-credit name=”Anthony Reed using Census 2010 data and bdistricting.com maps” align=”alignnone” width=”634″]doc2[/media-credit]

In a hopeful indication that this issue may get more widespread attention, the Supreme Court is also hearing a similar case from Virginia, Bethune-Hill vs. Virginia Board of Elections. That case challenges 12 legislative districts in the state because the Virginia legislature’s “decision that those districts be drawn with a minimum of 55% minority voting age population unconstitutionally relied on race as a ‘predominant factor’ for district design.”

Gerrymandering of this kind is a threat to a free, fair, and fully representative democracy. It is a promising sign that courts are tackling this issue.

But the U.S. Supreme Court will likely have the final say, making President-elect Donald Trump’s looming nomination to fill the still-vacant seat on the Court extremely important.


TAI News
Get the latest progressive news here first.

Tai News

Newsletter

Read More
Nebraska expected to pass combo bill on abortion, gender-affirming care for minors

Nebraska expected to pass combo bill on abortion, gender-affirming care for minors

By Associated Press - May 20, 2023
Rhode Island governor signs bill funding abortion health care coverage

Rhode Island governor signs bill funding abortion health care coverage

By Associated Press - May 19, 2023
Texas Legislature passes bill banning gender-affirming care for minors

Texas Legislature passes bill banning gender-affirming care for minors

By Will Fritz - May 18, 2023
North Carolina Republicans override governor’s veto of abortion ban

North Carolina Republicans override governor’s veto of abortion ban

By Rebekah Sager - May 18, 2023
Missouri attorney general rescinds rule restricting gender-affirming care

Missouri attorney general rescinds rule restricting gender-affirming care

By Will Fritz - May 18, 2023
Transgender man shares how an abortion saved his life

Transgender man shares how an abortion saved his life

By Rebekah Sager and Will Fritz - May 18, 2023
TAI News
Latest
House Republican lawmakers call bipartisan debt deal passage a win for Biden

House Republican lawmakers call bipartisan debt deal passage a win for Biden

By Josh Israel - June 01, 2023
Prominent Colorado abortion provider calls Dobbs decision ‘throwback to another century’

Prominent Colorado abortion provider calls Dobbs decision ‘throwback to another century’

By Rebekah Sager - June 01, 2023
McCarthy says Biden stopped him from cutting Social Security and Medicare

McCarthy says Biden stopped him from cutting Social Security and Medicare

By Emily Singer - June 01, 2023
North Carolina gubernatorial candidate wants public safety funding but voted against it

North Carolina gubernatorial candidate wants public safety funding but voted against it

By Josh Israel - June 01, 2023
Biden’s tentative debt limit deal is prioritizing the economy over politics

Biden’s tentative debt limit deal is prioritizing the economy over politics

By Oliver Willis - May 31, 2023
LGBTQ Voices in Politics: Tiffany Muller

LGBTQ Voices in Politics: Tiffany Muller

By Will Fritz - May 31, 2023
Close
TAI News
Get the latest progressive news here first.

Tai News

Newsletter