Investigation Hypocrisy: Republicans freaked out at Lynch-Clinton meeting, silent on FBI-Trump collusion
White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus met with the FBI and attempted to get top officials at the agency — Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — to refute media reports about contacts between the Donald Trump campaign team and Russian intelligence officials. The Associated Press described Priebus’ actions as “unusual contact with […]
White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus met with the FBI and attempted to get top officials at the agency — Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — to refute media reports about contacts between the Donald Trump campaign team and Russian intelligence officials. The Associated Press described Priebus’ actions as “unusual contact with law enforcement involved in a pending investigation.”
Yet there has been none of the boisterous condemnation of Priebus’ actions (coupled with Trump’s tweets and public statements whining about the agency’s decision against caving in to his deputy’s demands) from Republicans that we saw in their very public complaints about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
When Lynch had a brief meeting in June 2016 with former President Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an airport in Phoenix, Republicans freaked out and complained that it was part of an effort to pressure the Department of Justice as it looked into Hillary Clinton’s emails. Lynch explained at the time that the meeting “was a great deal about his grandchildren.”
But the right was not satisfied.
Trump himself told a radio host: “That’s terrible. And it was really a sneak. It was really something that they didn’t want publicized as I understand it. Wow, I just think it’s so terrible.”
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) fumed in a statement: “This incident does nothing to instill confidence in the American people that her department can fully and fairly conduct this investigation, and that’s why a special counsel is needed now more than ever.”
Lindsay Walters, a Republican National Committee spokeswoman complained: “How can the American people have confidence that the Justice Department is conducting an impartial investigation when US Attorney General Loretta Lynch is meeting with President Obama following his endorsement of Hillary Clinton and having a secret meeting with Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Arizona. These actions raise serious concerns over her ability to be objective in the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton.”
And then there was Priebus himself:
This raises even more questions about Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting with Obama's AG, Loretta Lynch
— Reince Priebus (@Reince) October 11, 2016
Ultimately the FBI decided against prosecuting Clinton, yet FBI director James Comey released a letter days before the election raising questions about Clinton’s emails that turned out to be a red herring. At the same time, Comey and the FBI refused to make public comments on the active, ongoing probe into Trump’s considerable Russian interactions — the same story Priebus and the White House are now trying to squelch.
And we are not hearing any substantive admonishment from the GOP.
Wisconsin’s skewed legislative maps could cost taxpayers millions in legal fees
Republican lawmakers plan to spend up to $1.8 million in taxpayer money to defend the state's gerrymandered maps.By Josh Israel - September 06, 2023
Republicans complain DOJ is funding campaign raising awareness about gun safety measures
The public overwhelmingly supports red flag laws, which allow law enforcement to prevent gun violence by temporarily confiscating guns from someone who poses a risk to themselves or others.By Oliver Willis - July 27, 2023
EPA launches $20 billion fund to boost clean energy projects and create thousands of jobs
Environmental groups slammed Republicans for trying to repeal funding for efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.By Oliver Willis - July 17, 2023